Scoring rules and epistemic compromise
نویسنده
چکیده
Formal models of epistemic compromise have several fundamental applications. Disagreeing agents may construct a compromise of their opinions to guide their collective action, to give a collective opinion to a third party, or to determine how they should update their individual credences. Recent literature on disagreement has focused on certain questions about epistemic compromise: when you find yourself disagreeing with an epistemic peer, under what circumstances, and to what degree, should you change your credence in the disputed proposition? Elga (2006) and Christensen (2007) say you should compromise often and deeply; Kelly (2010) disagrees. But these authors leave open another question: what constitutes a perfect compromise of opinion? In the disagreement literature, it is sometimes assumed that if we assign different credences ca and cb to a proposition p, we reach a perfect compromise by splitting the difference in our credences. In other words: to adopt a perfect compromise of our opinions is to assign (ca+cb)/2 credence to p. For instance, Kelly (2010) says that when peers assign 0.2 and 0.8 to a proposition, to adopt a compromise is to split the difference with one’s peer and believe the hypothesis to degree 0.5.2 But why does 0.5 constitute a perfect compromise? Of course, 0.5 is the arithmetic mean of 0.2 and 0.8. But why must a compromise of agents’ opinions always be the arithmetic mean of their prior credences? In other cases of compromise, we do not simply take it for granted that the outcome that constitutes a perfect compromise is determined by the
منابع مشابه
Probabilism, entropies and strictly proper scoring rules
Accuracy arguments are the en vogue route in epistemic justifications of probabilism and further norms governing rational belief. These arguments often depend on the fact that the employed inaccuracy measure is strictly proper. I argue controversially that it is ill-advised to assume that the employed inaccuracy measures are strictly proper and that strictly proper statistical scoring rules are...
متن کاملFuzzy Apriori Rule Extraction Using Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization: The Case of Credit Scoring
There are many methods introduced to solve the credit scoring problem such as support vector machines, neural networks and rule based classifiers. Rule bases are more favourite in credit decision making because of their ability to explicitly distinguish between good and bad applicants.In this paper multi-objective particle swarm is applied to optimize fuzzy apriori rule base in credit scoring. ...
متن کاملFuzzy Apriori Rule Extraction Using Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization: The Case of Credit Scoring
There are many methods introduced to solve the credit scoring problem such as support vector machines, neural networks and rule based classifiers. Rule bases are more favourite in credit decision making because of their ability to explicitly distinguish between good and bad applicants.In this paper multi-objective particle swarm is applied to optimize fuzzy apriori rule base in credit scoring. ...
متن کاملA Comparative Analysis of Epistemic and Root Modality in Two selected English Books in the Field of Applied Linguistics Written by English Native and Iranian Non-native Writers
Academic discourse has always been the focus of many linguists, especially those who have been involved with English for Academic Purposes (EAP) and discourse analysis. Persuasion, as part of rhetorical structure of academic writing, is partly achieved by employing modality markers. Adopting a descriptive design, the present study was carried out to compare the use of modality markers in terms...
متن کاملBelief Revision with General Epistemic States
In order to properly regulate iterated belief revision, Darwiche and Pearl (1997) model belief revision as revising epistemic states by propositions. An epistemic state in their sense consists of a belief set and a set of conditional beliefs. Although the denotation of an epistemic state can be indirectly captured by a total preorder on the set of worlds, it is unclear how to directly capture t...
متن کامل